HostEVA vs WSTETH — price, size and safety, side by side
EVA (Arbitrum) vs WSTETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
EVA vs WSTETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| EVA | WSTETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $45.42 | $3.38K |
| Market cap | — | $12.53B |
| 24h volume | $44.55K | $2.66M |
| Liquidity | $6.25M | $50.30M |
| FDV | $818.08M | $12.44B |
| Holders | 8,567 | 39,070 |
| Age (days) | 802 | 1,492 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- WSTETH measures ~8.0× the liquidity of EVA
- WSTETH measures ~60× the 24h volume of EVA
- WSTETH measures ~4.6× the holder count of EVA
What the data says
EVA
EVA — EverValueCoin at 0x45d9831d8751b2325f3dbf48db748723726e1c8c — is 802 days into an Arbitrum record with a contract that has stayed clean the whole way: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, source is verified, and the creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply.
The market structure splits two ways at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. $6.2 million of liquidity is a serious pool in absolute terms but thin against a $818.1 million cap — size an exit against the pool, not the cap — while the holder side is healthy: 8,567 wallets, with the top ten at about 29.5% — one of the broadest distributions among established tokens this batch.
WSTETH
wstETH is stETH made legible to DeFi — the same claim on Lido-staked Ether, wrapped so the balance stops moving: where stETH re-bases your token count upward each day, wstETH holds a fixed count and lets the exchange rate against stETH do the appreciating. That is the shape lending markets, bridges and LPs need, which is why the contract at 0x7f39c581f595b53c5cb19bd0b3f8da6c935e2ca0 became the canonical collateral form — our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $50.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on it.
The verdict therefore inherits stETH's, plus one wrapper-layer note. You hold a claim on staked ETH via Lido — subject to its validator set, Ethereum's exit queue, and stETH's own depeg memory (June 2022, when it traded visibly under par) — and the price shown for wstETH is stETH's price times a steadily growing conversion rate, so it will always quote above ETH while tracking correctly. Nothing about that is a defect; it is the mechanic to understand before reading the quote as a premium.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EVA or WSTETH?
By tracked market cap: EVA (Arbitrum) measures — and WSTETH (Ethereum) measures $12.53B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EVA or WSTETH?
On the contract checks we publish: EVA (Arbitrum) grades A and WSTETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EVA and WSTETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show EVA at −0.20% and WSTETH at −0.04%.
More comparisons
EVA vs STONKEVA vs BNC4BONK vs EVAEVA vs EUSXWSTETH vs LGNSWSTETH vs ETHWSTETH vs GHSTWSTETH vs RLUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.