NexEUSD vs CHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
EUSD (Base) vs CHIP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-09 / 2026-11-15.
EUSD vs CHIP — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| EUSD | CHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9977 | $0.027 |
| Market cap | $24.49M | $73.99M |
| 24h volume | $107.84K all venues | $11.10M all venues |
| Liquidity | $392.30K | $1.31M |
| FDV | $18.57M | $369.95M |
| Holders | 25,072 | 5,669 |
| Age (days) | 853 | 171 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~3.0× the market cap of EUSD
- CHIP measures ~3.3× the liquidity of EUSD
- CHIP measures ~103× the 24h volume of EUSD
- EUSD measures ~4.4× the holder count of CHIP
- over the shared window EUSD moved +0.10% while CHIP moved −34.4%
What the data says
EUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on EUSD to flag. The mint function on EUSD's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why EUSD is at C (55/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On liquidity and holders, EUSD shows $1.10M of on-chain liquidity, 25,072 holders and 853 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $1.10M of depth beside roughly $23.35M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A 25,072-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $1.3 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EUSD or CHIP?
By tracked market cap: EUSD (Base) measures $24.49M and CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $73.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EUSD or CHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: EUSD (Base) grades C and CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EUSD and CHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show EUSD at +0.10% and CHIP at −34.4%.
More comparisons
MON vs EUSDPYTH vs EUSDEUSD vs CRVEUSD vs GOHOMECHIP vs QNTONDO vs CHIPMORPHO vs CHIPCHIP vs LIT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.