HostETH vs 79AU — price, size and safety, side by side
ETH (Ethereum) vs 79AU (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ETH vs 79AU — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| ETH | 79AU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.72K | $6.26 |
| Market cap | $330.98B | $1.31B |
| 24h volume | $1.08M | $1.68M |
| Liquidity | $94.73M | $17.60M |
| FDV | $330.98B | $1.31B |
| Holders | — | 41,285 |
| Age (days) | 1,222 | 114 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ETH measures ~254× the market cap of 79AU
- ETH measures ~5.4× the liquidity of 79AU
- 79AU measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of ETH
What the data says
ETH
This page tracks native Ether through the 0xeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee placeholder — the convention several DEX aggregators and data APIs use to mean "the chain's own asset" in pair data, since ETH predates ERC-20 and has no contract of its own. Our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads about $94.7 million of tracked pool liquidity attributed to this label — real pools holding real ETH, with one bookkeeping caveat: the same native-asset convention shows up on other chains in this index — Arbitrum's own Ether row uses the all-zeroes address — so per-chain reads of "the ETH row" never quite mean the same slice of pools.
The safety verdict here is the simplest in the corpus: the asset is ETH — no issuer, no mint key, no admin, nothing to rug at the contract layer. The risks are the asset's own — price, network, the L1 itself.
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.3 billion cap on $17.6 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ETH or 79AU?
By tracked market cap: ETH (Ethereum) measures $330.98B and 79AU (BNB Chain) measures $1.31B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ETH or 79AU?
On the contract checks we publish: ETH (Ethereum) grades A and 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ETH and 79AU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show ETH at 0.00% and 79AU at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GALABET vs ETHETH vs FWWBTCNODA vs ETHETH vs CBBTC79AU vs WAVAX79AU vs BETBOME vs 79AU79AU vs PEPE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.