NexESP vs PEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
ESP (Arbitrum) vs PEAR (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-14.
ESP vs PEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| ESP | PEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.07196 | $0.01663 |
| Market cap | $55.11M | $9.46M |
| 24h volume | $2.77M all venues | $52.31K all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.50K | $929.51 |
| FDV | $5.85M | $15.68M |
| Holders | 3,444 | 2,431 |
| Age (days) | 237 | 740 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~5.8× the market cap of PEAR
- ESP measures ~1.6× the liquidity of PEAR
- ESP measures ~53× the 24h volume of PEAR
- over the shared window ESP moved −19.7% while PEAR moved −49.7%
What the data says
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $2 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $9.5 million market cap with a $15.7 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $929.5 of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ESP or PEAR?
By tracked market cap: ESP (Arbitrum) measures $55.11M and PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $9.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ESP or PEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: ESP (Arbitrum) grades B and PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ESP and PEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show ESP at −19.7% and PEAR at −49.7%.
More comparisons
ESP vs NODAESP vs BNSOLESP vs JITOSOLESP vs JLUSDCPEAR vs NODAPEAR vs BNSOLPEAR vs JITOSOLPEAR vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.