NexERC20 vs GWEI — price, size and safety, side by side
ERC20 (BNB Chain) vs GWEI (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-10.
ERC20 vs GWEI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| ERC20 | GWEI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000000000000 | $0.01701 |
| Market cap | $592 | $33.98M |
| 24h volume | $3.95 DEX | $8.33M all venues |
| Liquidity | $334.02K | $306.88K |
| FDV | $756.18 | $1.96M |
| Holders | 8,688 | 3,722 |
| Age (days) | 213 | 244 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GWEI measures ~57,406× the market cap of ERC20
- GWEI measures ~2,109,698× the 24h volume of ERC20
- ERC20 measures ~2.3× the holder count of GWEI
- over the shared window ERC20 moved −100.0% while GWEI moved −23.2%
What the data says
ERC20
ERC20 — a token literally named "ERC20" on BNB Chain at 0x58730ae0faa10d73b0cddb5e7b87c3594f7a20cb — carries the most extreme valuation split in this batch: a market cap of $592 against a fully diluted figure of $756.2 on the November 4, 2026 snapshot.
A $13.4B FDV over a $592 cap means the float is a rounding error — supply overwhelmingly sits outside circulation, so the circulating price says almost nothing about the token's headline value. The contract can mint on top of that, the top ten wallets hold about 76.3%, and even so 8,688 wallets hold positions — with $334.0 thousand of tracked depth, more book than the cap itself.
GWEI
GWEI at 0x30117e4bc17d7b044194b76a38365c53b72f7d49 — deployed under the name ETHGas — is a 244-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $34.0 million asset-wide market cap against a $2.0 million fully-diluted figure priced on 204.7 million local units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is workable and the tape is lively: $306.9 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ERC20 or GWEI?
By tracked market cap: ERC20 (BNB Chain) measures $592 and GWEI (BNB Chain) measures $33.98M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ERC20 or GWEI?
On the contract checks we publish: ERC20 (BNB Chain) grades B and GWEI (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ERC20 and GWEI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show ERC20 at −100.0% and GWEI at −23.2%.
More comparisons
ERC20 vs GOHOMECRV vs ERC20ERC20 vs VIRTUALMON vs ERC20GWEI vs VIRTUALGOHOME vs GWEICRV vs GWEIGWEI vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.