NexEARNAUSD vs MUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
EARNAUSD (Monad) vs MUSD (Linea) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-14.
EARNAUSD vs MUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| EARNAUSD | MUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.01 | $0.9828 |
| Market cap | $17.50M | $37.09M |
| 24h volume | $52.77 all venues | $16.91K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.33K | $378.79K |
| FDV | $17.85M | $5.48M |
| Holders | 2,607 | — |
| Age (days) | 12 | 169 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- MUSD measures ~2.1× the market cap of EARNAUSD
- MUSD measures ~284× the liquidity of EARNAUSD
- MUSD measures ~320× the 24h volume of EARNAUSD
- over the shared window EARNAUSD moved −85.7% while MUSD moved −1.13%
What the data says
EARNAUSD
earnAUSD is a yield-bearing dollar token on Monad — 23.9 million units priced at $1.011, a tracked market cap of $17.5 million. Tokens like this are deposit receipts: you hold AUSD-yield exposure and the price drifts above a dollar as yield accrues. The premium to $1.00 is the mechanism working.
The risk structure is concentrated, though. 2,607 holders is a modest base for a $30M token, and the top-10 wallets hold 95.5% of supply — earnAUSD's market is effectively a vault held by a few dozen real positions. Tracked pool depth of $1 thousand is thin, but that understates exit reality for a yield token: redemptions run through the issuer, not the DEX. The B at 77/100 reflects an upgradeable proxy plus unassessed contract controls — normal for a managed yield product, real nonetheless.
MUSD
One detail on MUSD didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where MUSD stands today: workable liquidity of $417.40K and a maturing record at 169 days as of 2026-10-09. The $417.40K pool against a ~$37.78M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EARNAUSD or MUSD?
By tracked market cap: EARNAUSD (Monad) measures $17.50M and MUSD (Linea) measures $37.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EARNAUSD or MUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: EARNAUSD (Monad) grades C and MUSD (Linea) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EARNAUSD and MUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show EARNAUSD at −85.7% and MUSD at −1.13%.
More comparisons
EARNAUSD vs NODAEARNAUSD vs BNSOLEARNAUSD vs JITOSOLEARNAUSD vs JLUSDCMON vs MUSDMUSD vs CRVMUSD vs GOHOMEPYTH vs MUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.