NexDOS vs BEM — price, size and safety, side by side
DOS (BNB Chain) vs BEM (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
DOS vs BEM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| DOS | BEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1673 | $14.38 |
| Market cap | $39.49M | $8.54M |
| 24h volume | $7.28M all venues | $649.15K all venues |
| Liquidity | $420.75K | $400.67K |
| FDV | $6.87M | $8.55M |
| Holders | 27,267 | 8,252 |
| Age (days) | 60 | 27 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- DOS measures ~4.6× the market cap of BEM
- DOS measures ~11× the 24h volume of BEM
- DOS measures ~3.3× the holder count of BEM
- over the shared window DOS moved −15.2% while BEM moved −37.4%
What the data says
DOS
DOS's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why DOS earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On the market side, DOS brings $419.49K of on-chain liquidity, 27,267 wallets holding and a young 60-day history as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $419.49K pool against a ~$45.94M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so DOS's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A 27,267-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
BEM
BEM is a 27-day-old BNB Chain token at 0x5ce033b2bfca3af30b3e8c8457deaf776a8b695a, priced at a $8.5 million market cap with $400.7 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The market side is workable for the token's size — nearly $1.3M of daily volume against a sub-half-million pool is hot turnover, the signature of an actively traded young asset. The unmeasured side matters more here: contract controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so everything about supply concentration stays open.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DOS or BEM?
By tracked market cap: DOS (BNB Chain) measures $39.49M and BEM (BNB Chain) measures $8.54M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DOS or BEM?
On the contract checks we publish: DOS (BNB Chain) grades A and BEM (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DOS and BEM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show DOS at −15.2% and BEM at −37.4%.
More comparisons
DOS vs MONPYTH vs DOSSTABLE vs DOSDOS vs CRVMON vs BEMPYTH vs BEMBEM vs CRVBEM vs GOHOME
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.