NexDOS vs AEON — price, size and safety, side by side
DOS (BNB Chain) vs AEON (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
DOS vs AEON — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| DOS | AEON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1673 | $0.02383 |
| Market cap | $39.49M | $5.55M |
| 24h volume | $7.28M all venues | $3.63M all venues |
| Liquidity | $420.75K | $386.43K |
| FDV | $6.87M | $22.57M |
| Holders | 27,267 | 52,214 |
| Age (days) | 60 | 75 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- DOS measures ~7.1× the market cap of AEON
- DOS measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of AEON
- AEON measures ~1.9× the holder count of DOS
- over the shared window DOS moved −15.2% while AEON moved −64.0%
What the data says
DOS
DOS's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why DOS earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On the market side, DOS brings $419.49K of on-chain liquidity, 27,267 wallets holding and a young 60-day history as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $419.49K pool against a ~$45.94M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so DOS's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A 27,267-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
AEON
AEON on BNB Chain at 0x277add739c6e0477616948357af9e79fe1ec9b80 is 57 days old at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, and it carries the weakest contract posture in this batch: the snapshot's assessor measures minting as still possible — new supply can be minted — freeze controls still active — balances can be frozen — and a contract owner that is present but hidden. That is the combination this index was built to surface, and the grade lands at D because of it.
The market side reads better than the contract side: $5.5 million of market cap against $22.6 million fully diluted on a 1.0 billion supply, $386.4 thousand of tracked depth that is deep relative to the cap, 52,214 holders, and $1.4 million of 24-hour volume. The ten largest wallets hold 88.4% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DOS or AEON?
By tracked market cap: DOS (BNB Chain) measures $39.49M and AEON (BNB Chain) measures $5.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DOS or AEON?
On the contract checks we publish: DOS (BNB Chain) grades A and AEON (BNB Chain) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DOS and AEON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show DOS at −15.2% and AEON at −64.0%.
More comparisons
DOS vs MONPYTH vs DOSSTABLE vs DOSDOS vs CRVMON vs AEONAEON vs CRVPYTH vs AEONAEON vs GOHOME
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.