NexDGAI vs CTM — price, size and safety, side by side
DGAI (BNB Chain) vs CTM (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-12.
DGAI vs CTM — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| DGAI | CTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7217 | $0.1785 |
| Market cap | $115.31M | — |
| 24h volume | $44.06M all venues | $607.04K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.40M | $1.31M |
| FDV | $768.77M | $58.16M |
| Holders | 8,642 | 4,989 |
| Age (days) | 46 | 189 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- DGAI measures ~73× the 24h volume of CTM
- DGAI measures ~1.7× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window DGAI moved −19.9% while CTM moved −30.8%
What the data says
DGAI
DGAI — DGrid AI on BNB Smart Chain, 0x10d4183389e99233db3cc981c43443ebd28ebd5e — is a 23-day-old AI-themed token with a market profile that deserves reading slowly: $1.4 million of tracked liquidity as of November 6, 2026, against roughly $27.7 million of 24-hour volume.
That volume-to-liquidity ratio — better than 9x — is the number that matters on this page. For the pool to cycle nine times its depth in a day, the same capital is churning through repeatedly, a pattern associated with market-maker activity and momentum desks rather than organic holder flow. High volume on a young token is not evidence of broad demand; it is evidence of activity, and those are different claims.
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our November 6, 2026 read shows $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DGAI or CTM?
By tracked market cap: DGAI (BNB Chain) measures $115.31M and CTM (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DGAI or CTM?
On the contract checks we publish: DGAI (BNB Chain) grades B and CTM (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DGAI and CTM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show DGAI at −19.9% and CTM at −30.8%.
More comparisons
ONDO vs DGAIMORPHO vs DGAIDGAI vs QNTMETH vs DGAICTM vs QNTONDO vs CTMMORPHO vs CTMMETH vs CTM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.