NexDGAI vs COLLECT — price, size and safety, side by side
DGAI (BNB Chain) vs COLLECT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
DGAI vs COLLECT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| DGAI | COLLECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7217 | $0.02527 |
| Market cap | $115.31M | $12.40M |
| 24h volume | $44.06M all venues | $6.61M all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.40M | $1.26M |
| FDV | $768.77M | $69.29M |
| Holders | 8,642 | 52,664 |
| Age (days) | 46 | 287 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- DGAI measures ~9.3× the market cap of COLLECT
- DGAI measures ~6.7× the 24h volume of COLLECT
- COLLECT measures ~6.1× the holder count of DGAI
- over the shared window DGAI moved −22.0% while COLLECT moved +49.4%
What the data says
DGAI
DGAI — DGrid AI on BNB Smart Chain, 0x10d4183389e99233db3cc981c43443ebd28ebd5e — is a 23-day-old AI-themed token with a market profile that deserves reading slowly: $1.4 million of tracked liquidity as of November 6, 2026, against roughly $27.7 million of 24-hour volume.
That volume-to-liquidity ratio — better than 9x — is the number that matters on this page. For the pool to cycle nine times its depth in a day, the same capital is churning through repeatedly, a pattern associated with market-maker activity and momentum desks rather than organic holder flow. High volume on a young token is not evidence of broad demand; it is evidence of activity, and those are different claims.
COLLECT
COLLECT at 0x4b3d30992f003c8167699735f5ab2831b2a087d3 — deployed under the name "Collect on Fanable" — is a 269-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $12.4 million market cap against a $69.3 million fully-diluted figure on 3.0 billion units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep for the float and the tape is working: $1.3 million of tracked depth on $1.2 million of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DGAI or COLLECT?
By tracked market cap: DGAI (BNB Chain) measures $115.31M and COLLECT (BNB Chain) measures $12.40M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DGAI or COLLECT?
On the contract checks we publish: DGAI (BNB Chain) grades B and COLLECT (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DGAI and COLLECT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show DGAI at −22.0% and COLLECT at +49.4%.
More comparisons
ONDO vs DGAIMORPHO vs DGAIDGAI vs QNTMETH vs DGAICOLLECT vs QNTONDO vs COLLECTMORPHO vs COLLECTCOLLECT vs LIT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.