NexCTR vs DOT — price, size and safety, side by side
CTR (Base) vs DOT (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-09 / 2026-11-08.
CTR vs DOT — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-06T21:16:47
| CTR | DOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01467 | $0.005643 |
| Market cap | $21.23M | $6.15M |
| 24h volume | $3.68M all venues | $107.04K all venues |
| Liquidity | $323.02K | $295.90K |
| FDV | $14.40M | $6.51M |
| Holders | 3,189 | 2,906 |
| Age (days) | 133 | 117 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- CTR measures ~3.5× the market cap of DOT
- CTR measures ~34× the 24h volume of DOT
- over the shared window CTR moved +11.7% while DOT moved −44.0%
What the data says
CTR
CTR passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts CTR at 100/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, CTR is showing $310.34K of on-chain liquidity, 3,189 wallets holding and 133 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $310.34K of depth beside roughly $19.00M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. The 3,189-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of CTR as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
DOT
DOT at 0x23a2847d772803f9efc64b4277b782b06296fe51 is Polkadot's relay-chain asset in bridged form on the Coinbase-incubated chain — 117 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, one of the younger deployments in this batch.
The float is essentially the whole book: a $6.1 million market cap nearly touching a $6.5 million fully-diluted read on 1.0 billion units — almost all of this deployment's supply is already circulating here. $295.9 thousand of tracked pool depth is deep relative to the float, on $446.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working book, not a token parked for show.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CTR or DOT?
By tracked market cap: CTR (Base) measures $21.23M and DOT (Base) measures $6.15M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CTR or DOT?
On the contract checks we publish: CTR (Base) grades A and DOT (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CTR and DOT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-06T21:16:47, the measured snapshots show CTR at +11.7% and DOT at −44.0%.
More comparisons
GOHOME vs CTRCTR vs VIRTUALCRV vs CTRMON vs CTRVIRTUAL vs DOTGOHOME vs DOTCRV vs DOTDOT vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-06T21:16:47; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.