Open app

CT vs Q — price, size and safety, side by side

CT (BNB Chain) vs Q (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-11.

CTB

$0.1037
Concrete on BNB Chain
Trade CT
vs

QB

$0.02898
Quack AI Token on BNB Chain
Trade Q

CT vs Q — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14

100 — shared start
CT −72.4%  ·  Q +33.3% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
CTQ
Price$0.1037$0.02898
Market cap$25.06M$143.35M
24h volume$19.31M all venues$12.10M all venues
Liquidity$445.78K$432.02K
FDV$3.73M$146.35M
Holders19,72219,190
Age (days)9404
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

CT

There's a small gap on this page — CT's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.

Market-wise, CT carries a $723.44K pool, 19,722 wallets holding and 9 days old as of 2026-10-09. Treat $723.44K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. The 19,722-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.

Q

Q at 0xc07e1300dc138601fa6b0b59f8d0fa477e690589 — Quack AI Token — is a 386-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $143.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $146.4 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.

The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is hot: $432.0 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool eight times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

FAQ

Which is bigger, CT or Q?

By tracked market cap: CT (BNB Chain) measures $25.06M and Q (BNB Chain) measures $143.35M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, CT or Q?

On the contract checks we publish: CT (BNB Chain) grades B and Q (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have CT and Q performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show CT at −72.4% and Q at +33.3%.

More comparisons

CT vs PYTHCT vs MONSTABLE vs CTCT vs CRVPYTH vs QQ vs MONSTABLE vs QQ vs CRV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.