HostCRVUSD vs WEETH — price, size and safety, side by side
CRVUSD (Ethereum) vs WEETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
CRVUSD vs WEETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CRVUSD | WEETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $2.97K |
| Market cap | $217.72M | $5.89B |
| 24h volume | $7.74M | $532.17K |
| Liquidity | $198.17M | $14.39M |
| FDV | $2.10B | $5.89B |
| Holders | 95,213 | 28,590 |
| Age (days) | 1,222 | 990 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WEETH measures ~27× the market cap of CRVUSD
- CRVUSD measures ~14× the liquidity of WEETH
- CRVUSD measures ~15× the 24h volume of WEETH
- CRVUSD measures ~3.3× the holder count of WEETH
- over the shared window CRVUSD moved +0.05% while WEETH moved +7.42%
What the data says
CRVUSD
CRVUSD is Curve's own stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited into Curve's LLAMMA system, which liquidates gradually across a price band instead of in a single cliff, the design that made it the DeFi stable built for volatile collateral. The deployment 0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e is the Ethereum mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $198.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: LLAMMA's soft-liquidation is genuinely novel — collateral converts to crvUSD gradually as price falls, cushioning the cliff-edge failure mode other CDP systems have. The trade-off is that the peg's quality is a function of Curve's collateral book and liquidation engine rather than a fiat reserve — verifiable on-chain, never guaranteed.
WEETH
weETH is ether.fi's wrapped eETH — the non-rebasing form of the liquid restaking token that sits on EigenLayer beneath the staking layer, so the holder earns both Ethereum staking yield and restaking yield in one claim. The deployment 0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $14.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: a restaking token is a claim on ETH that is doing two jobs at once — securing Ethereum's consensus and securing EigenLayer services — which means its risk stack is the union of both: staking slashing, restaking slashing, and ether.fi's own contract layer on top. The yield is real; so is the doubled surface it comes from.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRVUSD or WEETH?
By tracked market cap: CRVUSD (Ethereum) measures $217.72M and WEETH (Ethereum) measures $5.89B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRVUSD or WEETH?
On the contract checks we publish: CRVUSD (Ethereum) grades B and WEETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRVUSD and WEETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CRVUSD at +0.05% and WEETH at +7.42%.
More comparisons
FWWETH vs CRVUSDCRVUSD vs SASHIMIWBTC vs CRVUSDUSDC vs CRVUSDWEETH vs UWEETH vs USDCWEETH vs AGXUSDE vs WEETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.