HostCRVUSD vs PEAQ — price, size and safety, side by side
CRVUSD (Ethereum) vs PEAQ (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
CRVUSD vs PEAQ — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CRVUSD | PEAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.04343 |
| Market cap | $217.72M | $976.89K |
| 24h volume | $7.74M | $2.78M |
| Liquidity | $198.17M | $279.50K |
| FDV | $2.10B | $976.89K |
| Holders | 95,213 | 1,363 |
| Age (days) | 1,222 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CRVUSD measures ~223× the market cap of PEAQ
- CRVUSD measures ~709× the liquidity of PEAQ
- CRVUSD measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of PEAQ
- CRVUSD measures ~70× the holder count of PEAQ
- over the shared window CRVUSD moved −0.09% while PEAQ moved +73.1%
What the data says
CRVUSD
CRVUSD is Curve's own stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited into Curve's LLAMMA system, which liquidates gradually across a price band instead of in a single cliff, the design that made it the DeFi stable built for volatile collateral. The deployment 0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e is the Ethereum mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $198.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: LLAMMA's soft-liquidation is genuinely novel — collateral converts to crvUSD gradually as price falls, cushioning the cliff-edge failure mode other CDP systems have. The trade-off is that the peg's quality is a function of Curve's collateral book and liquidation engine rather than a fiat reserve — verifiable on-chain, never guaranteed.
PEAQ
peaq — PEAQ — is the token of a real DePIN-focused Layer-1: a chain built for "machine economy" applications, where devices and robots own wallets and earn directly. This is the bridged/wrapped Solana representation at mint PEAQjk7SRS6rXHVFFmpRr7zrC4g5ZuEebpwTxvaLr3b; the September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $279 thousand of liquidity and roughly 1,363 holders.
peaq is a genuine project — live mainnet, real DePIN ecosystem partners, a foundation out of Berlin — sitting in the honest middle of the L1 category: real technology, a long way between "mainnet works" and "the machine economy pays for the token." Its fate is the sector's: if DePIN demand materializes, an L1 positioned for it has leverage; if not, it has emissions.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRVUSD or PEAQ?
By tracked market cap: CRVUSD (Ethereum) measures $217.72M and PEAQ (Solana) measures $976.89K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRVUSD or PEAQ?
On the contract checks we publish: CRVUSD (Ethereum) grades B and PEAQ (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRVUSD and PEAQ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CRVUSD at −0.09% and PEAQ at +73.1%.
More comparisons
FWWETH vs CRVUSDCRVUSD vs SASHIMIWBTC vs CRVUSDUSDC vs CRVUSDPEAQ vs PLTRXPEAQ vs CAPKORI vs PEAQAVAX vs PEAQ
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.