NexCRV vs RETH — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Ethereum) vs RETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-13.
CRV vs RETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| CRV | RETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2376 | $2.35K |
| Market cap | $416.06M | $807.34M |
| 24h volume | $47.95M all venues | $62.88K all venues |
| Liquidity | $8.70M | $8.39M |
| FDV | $638.63M | $807.34M |
| Holders | 101,017 | 21,853 |
| Age (days) | 1,105 | 1,507 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RETH measures ~1.9× the market cap of CRV
- CRV measures ~763× the 24h volume of RETH
- CRV measures ~4.6× the holder count of RETH
- over the shared window CRV moved −30.9% while RETH moved −22.3%
What the data says
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $416.1 million market cap against an $638.6 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $8.7 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our November 6, 2026 read shows $8.4 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or RETH?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Ethereum) measures $416.06M and RETH (Ethereum) measures $807.34M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or RETH?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Ethereum) grades B and RETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and RETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show CRV at −30.9% and RETH at −22.3%.
More comparisons
CRV vs SKYSUSDAI vs CRVUSDTB vs CRVCRV vs KBTCRETH vs SKYRETH vs KBTCSUSDAI vs RETHRETH vs USDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.