HostCP vs PROS — price, size and safety, side by side
CP (Base) vs PROS (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
CP vs PROS — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| CP | PROS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01318 | $0.6105 |
| Market cap | $19.28M | $2.59M |
| 24h volume | $1.49M | $667.49K |
| Liquidity | $606.18K | $574.79K |
| FDV | $70.40M | $2.59M |
| Holders | 2,168 | 3,879 |
| Age (days) | 12 | 131 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- CP measures ~7.4× the market cap of PROS
- CP measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of PROS
- PROS measures ~1.8× the holder count of CP
- over the shared window CP moved 0.00% while PROS moved +43.7%
What the data says
CP
CP — Cluster Protocol on Base, 0x001aad84c21a5cd4d696c56d44866e9703c43f77 — is a twelve-day-old token carrying $606 thousand of liquidity in the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with roughly $1.5 million of daily volume.
Two-letter tickers are contested namespace — "CP" resolves to nothing distinctive, which makes the address the entire identity. At twelve days the token is in its first market regime: turnover near 2.5x the pool is a live book without the manic churn of the mirrored-clone cohort.
PROS
PROS — Wrapped PROS on Base, 0x8b7dde054be9d180c1be7fae0874697374a49832 — is the wrapped form of a token with a real home elsewhere: PROS is the Prosper/Prosper-predict ecosystem token, and a wrapped ERC-20 on Base is the cross-chain form of it. The September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $575 thousand of liquidity and roughly $2.7 million of daily volume.
A wrapped token's risk model differs from a native one: the honest questions are which bridge or custodian mints the wrapper, whether the canonical contract is the one at this address, and what the redemption path back to the native asset looks like. $0.44 per token across 103 days of tracked age describes a wrapper with a sustained market — the depth to trade, and the standing caveat that wrapper integrity is only as good as its bridge.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CP or PROS?
By tracked market cap: CP (Base) measures $19.28M and PROS (Base) measures $2.59M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CP or PROS?
On the contract checks we publish: CP (Base) grades C and PROS (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CP and PROS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show CP at 0.00% and PROS at +43.7%.
More comparisons
CP vs DOGECP vs AAPLXCP vs COLLECTSTONKEX vs CPPROS vs FBOMBPROS vs MORCROSS vs PROSTUNA vs PROS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.