HostCIPHER vs ZAILGO — price, size and safety, side by side
CIPHER (Solana) vs ZAILGO (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CIPHER vs ZAILGO — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| CIPHER | ZAILGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001558 | $0.00005738 |
| Market cap | $321.99K | $56.45K |
| 24h volume | $565.60 | $0.2361 |
| Liquidity | $30.93K | $30.71K |
| FDV | $1.61M | $56.45K |
| Holders | 469 | 17,339 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CIPHER measures ~5.7× the market cap of ZAILGO
- CIPHER measures ~2,396× the 24h volume of ZAILGO
- ZAILGO measures ~37× the holder count of CIPHER
- over the shared window CIPHER moved −9.86% while ZAILGO moved +10.4%
What the data says
CIPHER
Cipher — CIPHER — a Solana token at mint Ciphern9cCXtms66s8Mm6wCFC27b2JProRQLYmiLMH3N. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $31 thousand of liquidity and roughly 469 holders.
469 holders is a thin registry — concentrated ownership under a $31 thousand pool.
ZAILGO
ZAILGO — rendered in zalgo glitch text as "Z̶A̴I̴L̶G̶O̸" on Solana, mint GorvUUSkJGSzJUebM5W6berUkZ5pG8nmnn7tmk74pump — is an AI-agent token whose brand is corrupted text: the zalgo aesthetic (unicode combining characters that "glitch" the name) signals a corrupted-machine persona. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $56 thousand across 17,339 holders.
Seventeen thousand wallets is a wide file — the glitchy name was distinctive enough to spread. ~$3 of cap per wallet is dust; ~$6 of daily volume on $31 thousand is a dead book. Mint and freeze revoked; no site or handle.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CIPHER or ZAILGO?
By tracked market cap: CIPHER (Solana) measures $321.99K and ZAILGO (Solana) measures $56.45K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CIPHER or ZAILGO?
On the contract checks we publish: CIPHER (Solana) grades B and ZAILGO (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CIPHER and ZAILGO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show CIPHER at −9.86% and ZAILGO at +10.4%.
More comparisons
CIPHER vs ASVMOSS vs CIPHERCIPHER vs DOLLOCIPHER vs ZACKZAILGO vs DOLLOZAILGO vs ZACKZAILGO vs BUCKYASV vs ZAILGO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.