NexCHIP vs MUC — price, size and safety, side by side
CHIP (Arbitrum) vs MUC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-09.
CHIP vs MUC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| CHIP | MUC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.027 | $684.08 |
| Market cap | $73.99M | $852.03K |
| 24h volume | $11.10M all venues | $4.28M all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.31M | $339.03K |
| FDV | $369.95M | $852.03K |
| Holders | 5,669 | — |
| Age (days) | 171 | 14 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~87× the market cap of MUC
- CHIP measures ~3.8× the liquidity of MUC
- CHIP measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of MUC
What the data says
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $1.3 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
MUC
There's a small gap on this page — MUC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, MUC shows deep liquidity of $498.38K and a brand-new 14-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $959.97K in market cap, the $498.38K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CHIP or MUC?
By tracked market cap: CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $73.99M and MUC (Base) measures $852.03K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CHIP or MUC?
On the contract checks we publish: CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B and MUC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CHIP and MUC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show CHIP at −34.4% and MUC at −35.9%.
More comparisons
CHIP vs QNTONDO vs CHIPMORPHO vs CHIPCHIP vs LITCRV vs MUCMUC vs GOHOMEMUC vs VIRTUALMON vs MUC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.