NexBTG vs 一 — price, size and safety, side by side
BTG (BNB Chain) vs 一 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
BTG vs 一 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| BTG | 一 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6147 | $0.0008793 |
| Market cap | $1.34M | $3.39M |
| 24h volume | $404.09K all venues | $35.26 DEX |
| Liquidity | $63.88K | $57.26K |
| FDV | $14.06M | $900.00K |
| Holders | 64,175 | 74,515 |
| Age (days) | 374 | 249 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 一 measures ~2.5× the market cap of BTG
- BTG measures ~11,461× the 24h volume of 一
- over the shared window BTG moved −24.8% while 一 moved −38.7%
What the data says
BTG
Start with the good news — BTG's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason BTG's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On liquidity and holders, BTG shows $65.16K of on-chain liquidity, 64,175 wallets holding and an established record at 374 days as of 2026-10-09. The $65.16K pool against a ~$1.75M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The 64,175-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
一
一 — the name is the Chinese character for "one" — at 0xef91c1eae97edcd429a5ad197753a6c3e4214444 is 249 days into a BNB Chain record, 74,515 wallets holding a $3.4 million book at the November 5, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot's rare quality is in the spread: the ten largest wallets hold about 9.8% of supply — the broadest top-10 distribution in this batch by a distance — while the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The contract cannot mint new supply and cannot pause or blacklist transfers, and its source is verified. The flagged item is modest liquidity: $57 thousand of tracked depth against a roughly $1.5-million daily tape — workable, but thin enough that size moves the price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BTG or 一?
By tracked market cap: BTG (BNB Chain) measures $1.34M and 一 (BNB Chain) measures $3.39M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BTG or 一?
On the contract checks we publish: BTG (BNB Chain) grades A and 一 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BTG and 一 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show BTG at −24.8% and 一 at −38.7%.
More comparisons
UNI vs BTGLINK.E vs BTGBTG vs TSATBTG vs POL一 vs TSATUNI vs 一一 vs POLLINK.E vs 一
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.