HostBLACK vs VIRTUAL — price, size and safety, side by side
BLACK (Avalanche) vs VIRTUAL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
BLACK vs VIRTUAL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| BLACK | VIRTUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.006383 | $0.7984 |
| Market cap | $1.82M | $22.88M |
| 24h volume | $108.99K | $399.67K |
| Liquidity | $398.67K | $2.19M |
| FDV | $1.84M | $22.88M |
| Holders | 19,358 | 28,376 |
| Age (days) | 430 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- VIRTUAL measures ~13× the market cap of BLACK
- VIRTUAL measures ~5.5× the liquidity of BLACK
- VIRTUAL measures ~3.7× the 24h volume of BLACK
- over the shared window BLACK moved +136% while VIRTUAL moved +12.4%
What the data says
BLACK
BLACK at 0xcd94a87696fac69edae3a70fe5725307ae1c43f6 — the BLACKHOLE token — is an Avalanche asset 430 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $1.8 million market cap sitting effectively equal to its $1.8 million fully-diluted figure on 284.6 million units: the float is out.
19,358 holders share the book, with the ten largest wallets holding 45.8% of supply — a moderate top bracket for the chain. The counterweights sit in the contract: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. $398.7 thousand of tracked depth reads deep against the small cap, though the $7.9 thousand daily volume is quiet.
VIRTUAL
VIRTUAL is Virtuals Protocol's token — the asset behind one of crypto-AI's more durable experiments: a platform where AI agents launch as tradable tokens and their activity routes value back to the protocol's token. The mint 3iQL8BFS2vE7mww4ehAqQHAsbmRNCrPxizWAT2Zfyr9y is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $2.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest shape: Virtuals is a platform bet in the crypto-AI cohort — its token's value depends on agents it hosts actually generating sustained activity rather than launch-day volume spikes, which is the failure mode most agent-token platforms hit. The A grade covers the Solana mint; the platform's usage is an off-chain measurement.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLACK or VIRTUAL?
By tracked market cap: BLACK (Avalanche) measures $1.82M and VIRTUAL (Solana) measures $22.88M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLACK or VIRTUAL?
On the contract checks we publish: BLACK (Avalanche) grades B and VIRTUAL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLACK and VIRTUAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show BLACK at +136% and VIRTUAL at +12.4%.
More comparisons
BLACK vs CODECICP vs BLACKBLACK vs MCDXPAXG vs BLACKVIRTUAL vs CARDSRNT vs VIRTUALPIPPIN vs VIRTUALANSEM vs VIRTUAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.