HostBLACK vs QI — price, size and safety, side by side
BLACK (Avalanche) vs QI (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
BLACK vs QI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| BLACK | QI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002101 | $0.001606 |
| Market cap | $843.61K | $12.94M |
| 24h volume | $10.67K all venues | $979.78K all venues |
| Liquidity | $232.64K | $172.57K |
| FDV | $855.00K | $12.94M |
| Holders | 19,436 | 39,822 |
| Age (days) | 445 | 1,838 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- QI measures ~15× the market cap of BLACK
- QI measures ~92× the 24h volume of BLACK
- QI measures ~2.0× the holder count of BLACK
- over the shared window BLACK moved −22.3% while QI moved +14.2%
What the data says
BLACK
BLACK at 0xcd94a87696fac69edae3a70fe5725307ae1c43f6 — the BLACKHOLE token — is an Avalanche asset 430 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $843.6 thousand market cap sitting effectively equal to its $855.0 thousand fully-diluted figure on 284.6 million units: the float is out.
19,436 holders share the book, with the ten largest wallets holding 45.8% of supply — a moderate top bracket for the chain. The counterweights sit in the contract: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. $232.6 thousand of tracked depth reads deep against the small cap, though the $7.9 thousand daily volume is quiet.
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $12.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $172.6 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLACK or QI?
By tracked market cap: BLACK (Avalanche) measures $843.61K and QI (Avalanche) measures $12.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLACK or QI?
On the contract checks we publish: BLACK (Avalanche) grades B and QI (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLACK and QI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show BLACK at −22.3% and QI at +14.2%.
More comparisons
BLACK vs ICPBLACK vs SOLVBTCBLACK vs UVMBLACK vs AAVE.EGRASS vs QIQI vs ETHFIQI vs ZROQI vs FF
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.