HostBET vs DIMO — price, size and safety, side by side
BET (Polygon) vs DIMO (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
BET vs DIMO — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| BET | DIMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000002447 | $0.01398 |
| Market cap | — | $7.52M |
| 24h volume | $2.20K all venues | $172.61K all venues |
| Liquidity | $34.13K | $15.83K |
| FDV | $1.91M | $7.65M |
| Holders | 72,804 | 80,375 |
| Age (days) | 870 | 1,388 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- BET measures ~2.2× the liquidity of DIMO
- DIMO measures ~78× the 24h volume of BET
- over the shared window BET moved −98.4% while DIMO moved −68.8%
What the data says
BET
BET at 0xbf7970d56a150cd0b60bd08388a4a75a27777777 — the vanity tail of sevens is intentional — is a Polygon token 870 days into its record at the October 31, 2026 snapshot, carrying the most lopsided market shape in this batch: $34 thousand of tracked pool depth, deep by the index's measure, with only $9.3 thousand of 24-hour volume moving through it. The market cap carries no price reading on the snapshot.
The contract side is the strong half: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A on the code read. The distribution side is the thing to weigh: 72,804 wallets hold a slice of a 777.8 billion supply, and the ten largest wallets hold 95.2% of it — a handful of addresses can move or exit most of this market at will.
DIMO
One detail on DIMO didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On liquidity and holders, DIMO shows $21.19K of on-chain liquidity, 80,375 wallets holding and an established record at 1,388 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $21.19K of depth against a market cap of about $22.11M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: DIMO reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 80,375-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BET or DIMO?
By tracked market cap: BET (Polygon) measures — and DIMO (Polygon) measures $7.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BET or DIMO?
On the contract checks we publish: BET (Polygon) grades A and DIMO (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BET and DIMO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show BET at −98.4% and DIMO at −68.8%.
More comparisons
POL vs BETBET vs CAKETSAT vs BETBET vs WEETHDIMO vs CAKEDIMO vs WEETHDIMO vs RETHDIMO vs NODA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.