Nex牛来 vs TWT — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (BNB Chain) vs TWT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-11.
牛来 vs TWT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| 牛来 | TWT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0591 | $0.3921 |
| Market cap | $63.81M | $166.45M |
| 24h volume | $11.87M all venues | $5.91M all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.06M | $1.01M |
| FDV | $63.81M | $399.41M |
| Holders | 64,716 | 303,413 |
| Age (days) | 52 | 1,142 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- TWT measures ~2.6× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of TWT
- TWT measures ~4.7× the holder count of 牛来
- over the shared window 牛来 moved −44.4% while TWT moved −33.5%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 at 0xbeea1d618e533a387d941f58a7d4c9b7bd377777 — a Chinese-language ticker, name and contract all reading as one — is a 37-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $63.8 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $1.1 million of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — real flow for a month-old book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
TWT
TWT — Trust Wallet Token at 0x4b0f1812e5df2a09796481ff14017e6005508003 — is the utility token of Trust Wallet, the mobile wallet Binance acquired in 2018 and that a large share of BNB Chain retail uses as its front end. TWT's value tracks that distribution: fee discounts, governance nods, and promotional utility inside one of crypto's most-installed wallets.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $166.5 million market cap against an $399.4 million FDV — about 42% of the billion-unit supply circulating, the rest in treasury and lockups — with $1.0 million of tracked pool depth and 303,413 holders.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or TWT?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (BNB Chain) measures $63.81M and TWT (BNB Chain) measures $166.45M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or TWT?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (BNB Chain) grades A and TWT (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and TWT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at −44.4% and TWT at −33.5%.
More comparisons
QNT vs 牛来牛来 vs LIT牛来 vs AKE牛来 vs USDT0TWT vs LITTWT vs AKETWT vs USDT0QNT vs TWT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.