Host牛来 vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (BNB Chain) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
牛来 vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 牛来 | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1066 | $14.30 |
| Market cap | $111.63M | $9.76B |
| 24h volume | $5.62M | $2.58M |
| Liquidity | $1.85M | $24.03M |
| FDV | $111.63M | $13.05B |
| Holders | 65,574 | 919,439 |
| Age (days) | 37 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~87× the market cap of 牛来
- LINK measures ~13× the liquidity of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of LINK
- LINK measures ~14× the holder count of 牛来
- over the shared window 牛来 moved −5.01% while LINK moved +10.3%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 at 0xbeea1d618e533a387d941f58a7d4c9b7bd377777 — a Chinese-language ticker, name and contract all reading as one — is a 37-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $111.6 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $1.8 million of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — real flow for a month-old book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or LINK?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (BNB Chain) measures $111.63M and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (BNB Chain) grades A and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at −5.01% and LINK at +10.3%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs NEETALCH vs 牛来GOAT vs 牛来牛来 vs WNEARLINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.