HostBEAM vs UST — price, size and safety, side by side
BEAM (Avalanche) vs UST (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
BEAM vs UST — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| BEAM | UST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00416 | $0.003807 |
| Market cap | $205.24M | $79.67K |
| 24h volume | $22.95M all venues | $2.75K DEX |
| Liquidity | $60.69K | $56.77K |
| FDV | $430.82K | $63.58K |
| Holders | 11,104 | 7,230 |
| Age (days) | 801 | 1,705 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- BEAM measures ~2,576× the market cap of UST
- BEAM measures ~8,348× the 24h volume of UST
- BEAM measures ~1.5× the holder count of UST
- over the shared window BEAM moved +64.8% while UST moved −34.5%
What the data says
BEAM
One detail on BEAM didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Here's where BEAM stands today: a $61.76K pool, a holder base of 11,104 and an established record at 801 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $133.79M, that $61.76K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. The 11,104-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of BEAM as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
UST
UST on Avalanche at 0x260bbf5698121eb85e7a74f2e45e16ce762ebe11 — "Axelar Wrapped UST" — is a remnant of the TerraUSD collapse carried over a bridge: what was once the dollar-pegged stablecoin now trades around $0.006, kept alive as a speculative claim on nothing in particular.
At the November 6, 2026 snapshot the book reads like an artifact rather than a market: $57 thousand of liquidity against a $80 thousand cap — a pool bigger than the cap, because the price already found its floor — across 1,705 days of history and a few thousand dollars of daily volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the wrapper's levers are unverified.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BEAM or UST?
By tracked market cap: BEAM (Avalanche) measures $205.24M and UST (Avalanche) measures $79.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BEAM or UST?
On the contract checks we publish: BEAM (Avalanche) grades B and UST (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BEAM and UST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show BEAM at +64.8% and UST at −34.5%.
More comparisons
UNI vs BEAMBEAM vs TSATLINK.E vs BEAMBEAM vs POLUST vs TSATUNI vs USTUST vs POLLINK.E vs UST
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.