NexBASECAT vs QUID — price, size and safety, side by side
BASECAT (Base) vs QUID (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-14 / 2026-11-12.
BASECAT vs QUID — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-11-07T18:16:33
| BASECAT | QUID | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.005876 | $0.05013 |
| Market cap | $8.96M | $8.12M |
| 24h volume | $2.70M all venues | $3.73M all venues |
| Liquidity | $428.65K | $407.70K |
| FDV | $8.96M | $56.74M |
| Holders | 9,121 | 14,990 |
| Age (days) | 30 | 16 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- QUID measures ~1.6× the holder count of BASECAT
- over the shared window BASECAT moved +14029% while QUID moved −22.4%
What the data says
BASECAT
BASECAT on Base — contract 0xb2000000000000000000004c27f6523082f41d01 — is the largest survivor of the `0xb20000…` factory deployer indexed here: $429 thousand of liquidity and $5.2 million of daily volume at its November 6, 2026 snapshot, sixteen days old — ancient by factory-cohort standards.
Sixteen days is the meaningful number: the sibling contracts from this deployer (cookcat, plumber, dogue) were all single-digit days old at their snapshots — Basecat is the one the market kept. A 16x daily turnover on $330k of liquidity is still manufacturing-flavored flow, but survival past two weeks separates it from the churn that dies in 72 hours.
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the November 6, 2026 snapshot with $408 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BASECAT or QUID?
By tracked market cap: BASECAT (Base) measures $8.96M and QUID (Base) measures $8.12M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BASECAT or QUID?
On the contract checks we publish: BASECAT (Base) grades B and QUID (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BASECAT and QUID performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-11-07T18:16:33, the measured snapshots show BASECAT at +14029% and QUID at −22.4%.
More comparisons
PYTH vs BASECATBASECAT vs MONSTABLE vs BASECATBASECAT vs CRVMON vs QUIDPYTH vs QUIDQUID vs CRVSTABLE vs QUID
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-11-07T18:16:33; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.