Nex牛马 vs PTB — price, size and safety, side by side
牛马 (BNB Chain) vs PTB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
牛马 vs PTB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| 牛马 | PTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00001053 | $0.00002095 |
| Market cap | $11.58K | $52.59K |
| 24h volume | $2.27K all venues | $2.03M all venues |
| Liquidity | $22.02K | $8.03K |
| FDV | $11.58K | $32.14K |
| Holders | 8,984 | 34,686 |
| Age (days) | 3 | 384 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- PTB measures ~4.5× the market cap of 牛马
- 牛马 measures ~2.7× the liquidity of PTB
- PTB measures ~897× the 24h volume of 牛马
- PTB measures ~3.9× the holder count of 牛马
What the data says
牛马
牛马 at 0xb077ada375b5e416f15e8b8f6827dadfa53a7777 — a workhorse-slang name on a contract that ends in four sevens — is a three-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $12 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the November 4, 2026 snapshot.
The launch book is deep for the float and the tape is hot: $22.0 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool twenty-seven times daily on day three. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
PTB
PTB at 0x95c9b514566fbd224dc2037f5914eb8ab91c9201 — Portal To Bitcoin — is a 384-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $53 thousand asset-wide market cap against a $32 thousand fully-diluted figure on 1.1 billion local units at the November 4, 2026 snapshot.
The shape here is the tape: $8.0 thousand of workable depth against $1.6 million of 24-hour volume — turnover approaching forty times the pool daily, one of the busiest churn profiles in the tracked set. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛马 or PTB?
By tracked market cap: 牛马 (BNB Chain) measures $11.58K and PTB (BNB Chain) measures $52.59K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛马 or PTB?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛马 (BNB Chain) grades C and PTB (BNB Chain) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛马 and PTB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show 牛马 at −99.5% and PTB at −98.2%.
More comparisons
牛马 vs CAKE牛马 vs WEETH牛马 vs RETH牛马 vs NODAPTB vs WEETHPTB vs RETHCAKE vs PTBPTB vs NODA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.