Nex牛马 vs GALABET — price, size and safety, side by side
牛马 (BNB Chain) vs GALABET (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-11.
牛马 vs GALABET — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| 牛马 | GALABET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00001053 | $0.0003274 |
| Market cap | $11.58K | — |
| 24h volume | $2.27K all venues | $20.82M DEX |
| Liquidity | $22.02K | $1.19K |
| FDV | $11.58K | $9.805644351263989e+44T |
| Holders | 8,984 | 52,665 |
| Age (days) | 3 | 293 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- 牛马 measures ~19× the liquidity of GALABET
- GALABET measures ~9,185× the 24h volume of 牛马
- GALABET measures ~5.9× the holder count of 牛马
What the data says
牛马
牛马 at 0xb077ada375b5e416f15e8b8f6827dadfa53a7777 — a workhorse-slang name on a contract that ends in four sevens — is a three-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $12 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the November 4, 2026 snapshot.
The launch book is deep for the float and the tape is hot: $22.0 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool twenty-seven times daily on day three. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
GALABET
GALABET CASINO is a BNB Chain token tied to the betting site that shares its name, deployed at 0x6d6521283cd3fd0188fe0408e700a5790a0f6c61. This snapshot is dated November 4, 2026, 278 days after the contract first appeared.
The measured shape is unusual: $1 thousand of tracked liquidity and 52,665 holders, yet $2.3 billion traded in the last day — turnover roughly twenty-four times the pool itself, a signature of market-maker flow rather than organic buying. The top-ten wallets hold 100.0% of supply, so the entire float sits in a handful of accounts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛马 or GALABET?
By tracked market cap: 牛马 (BNB Chain) measures $11.58K and GALABET (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛马 or GALABET?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛马 (BNB Chain) grades C and GALABET (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛马 and GALABET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show 牛马 at −99.5% and GALABET at −100.0%.
More comparisons
牛马 vs CAKE牛马 vs WEETH牛马 vs RETH牛马 vs NODAGALABET vs NODAGALABET vs BNSOLGALABET vs JITOSOLGALABET vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.