HostATTN vs MCA — price, size and safety, side by side
ATTN (Solana) vs MCA (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
ATTN vs MCA — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| ATTN | MCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01478 | $0.000003199 |
| Market cap | $1.49M | $3.51K |
| 24h volume | $17.59K | $165.56 |
| Liquidity | $78.33K | $2.30K |
| FDV | $1.49M | $3.20K |
| Holders | 972 | 2,837 |
| Age (days) | — | 298 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ATTN measures ~424× the market cap of MCA
- ATTN measures ~34× the liquidity of MCA
- ATTN measures ~106× the 24h volume of MCA
- MCA measures ~2.9× the holder count of ATTN
What the data says
ATTN
ATTN — Attention Mine — is a Solana attention-economy token, and it wins the attn slug over a smaller sibling ("attn markets"). The mint H1kXUqEPkQNNeNjGNN5tuHf3nsQK2vB1jUA9c4RggpUf is what our scan tracks: $1.5 million market cap, $78 thousand of liquidity and 972 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: attention-marketplace tokens price on the meta they are literally named for — fitting, if circular. The holder count is concentrated, the pool is functional, and the sibling ATTN exists to catch exactly the buyers who do not check the mint. The contract above is the slug winner.
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATTN or MCA?
By tracked market cap: ATTN (Solana) measures $1.49M and MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATTN or MCA?
On the contract checks we publish: ATTN (Solana) grades B and MCA (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATTN and MCA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show ATTN at −0.33% and MCA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
IMG vs ATTNBRK.BX vs ATTNATTN vs RIFTATTN vs SOSOMCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.