HostATH vs RISE — price, size and safety, side by side
ATH (Polygon) vs RISE (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ATH vs RISE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| ATH | RISE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $20.39 | $0.0006584 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $94.45K | $31.48K |
| Liquidity | $1.45M | $849.23K |
| FDV | $34.63M | $2.48M |
| Holders | 25,650 | 93,329 |
| Age (days) | 116 | 165 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ATH measures ~1.7× the liquidity of RISE
- ATH measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of RISE
- RISE measures ~3.6× the holder count of ATH
- over the shared window ATH moved +0.19% while RISE moved −91.0%
What the data says
ATH
One detail on ATH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-27 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where ATH stands today: $1.45M of on-chain liquidity, 25,650 wallets holding and a maturing record at 116 days as of 2026-09-27. Read $1.45M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 25,650 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
RISE
RISE gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. Neither lever existing is the main reason RISE's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-27).
By the numbers, RISE is showing a $849.23K pool, 93,329 wallets holding and 165 days old as of 2026-09-27. Read $849.23K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. A 93,329-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of RISE as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATH or RISE?
By tracked market cap: ATH (Polygon) measures — and RISE (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATH or RISE?
On the contract checks we publish: ATH (Polygon) grades B and RISE (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATH and RISE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show ATH at +0.19% and RISE at −91.0%.
More comparisons
ATH vs ZENATH vs TSLAXATH vs TELATH vs TBTCGOOGLC vs RISELINK vs RISELDO vs RISERISE vs AEON
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.