HostATH vs MKR — price, size and safety, side by side
ATH (Polygon) vs MKR (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ATH vs MKR — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| ATH | MKR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $20.39 | $1.71K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $94.45K | $111.73K |
| Liquidity | $1.45M | $1.44M |
| FDV | $34.63M | $144.89M |
| Holders | 25,650 | 75,222 |
| Age (days) | 116 | — |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- MKR measures ~2.9× the holder count of ATH
What the data says
ATH
One detail on ATH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-27 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where ATH stands today: $1.45M of on-chain liquidity, 25,650 wallets holding and a maturing record at 116 days as of 2026-09-27. Read $1.45M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 25,650 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
MKR
One thing stands out on MKR, and it's worth knowing up front. Right now MKR's contract keeps its mint and freeze levers (2026-09-27 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. Until that changes, MKR stays around 49/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where MKR stands today: deep liquidity of $1.44M and a holder base of 75,222 as of 2026-09-27. Read $1.44M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 75,222 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created MKR holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATH or MKR?
By tracked market cap: ATH (Polygon) measures — and MKR (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATH or MKR?
On the contract checks we publish: ATH (Polygon) grades B and MKR (Ethereum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATH and MKR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show ATH at 0.00% and MKR at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ATH vs ZENATH vs TSLAXATH vs TELATH vs TBTCMKR vs TSLAXMKR vs TELZEN vs MKRMKR vs TBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.