HostATH vs AMWBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
ATH (Polygon) vs AMWBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
ATH vs AMWBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| ATH | AMWBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $20.73 | $64.93K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $95.69K DEX | $19.42K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.28M | $811.67K |
| FDV | $48.25M | $4.62M |
| Holders | 25,673 | 9,807 |
| Age (days) | 134 | 1,518 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ATH measures ~1.6× the liquidity of AMWBTC
- ATH measures ~4.9× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- ATH measures ~2.6× the holder count of AMWBTC
- over the shared window ATH moved +1.84% while AMWBTC moved −19.9%
What the data says
ATH
ATH — 0x6b998441f7349a7bfdbb2a6d61a6d5f9acb90de8 — is the Aegis token on Polygon, a ticket that carries the Greek word for shield. At 116 days old it is past the newborn phase where most tokens in this ledger die.
The November 4, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool depth and 25,673 holders against a fully diluted valuation of $48.3 million — the market-cap field is empty in this read, so FDV is the honest size figure. Unit price prints near $20.39, down a fraction of a percent on the day.
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $812 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATH or AMWBTC?
By tracked market cap: ATH (Polygon) measures — and AMWBTC (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATH or AMWBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: ATH (Polygon) grades B and AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATH and AMWBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show ATH at +1.84% and AMWBTC at −19.9%.
More comparisons
ATH vs QNTONDO vs ATHMORPHO vs ATHATH vs LITUSDT0 vs AMWBTCAMWBTC vs USD₮0AMWBTC vs TBTCAKE vs AMWBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.