HostATH vs AMWBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
ATH (Polygon) vs AMWBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
ATH vs AMWBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| ATH | AMWBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $20.39 | $81.05K |
| Market cap | — | $5.14M |
| 24h volume | $94.45K | $13.74K |
| Liquidity | $1.45M | $943.43K |
| FDV | $34.63M | $5.03M |
| Holders | 25,650 | 9,807 |
| Age (days) | 116 | 1,518 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ATH measures ~1.5× the liquidity of AMWBTC
- ATH measures ~6.9× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- ATH measures ~2.6× the holder count of AMWBTC
What the data says
ATH
One detail on ATH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-27 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where ATH stands today: $1.45M of on-chain liquidity, 25,650 wallets holding and a maturing record at 116 days as of 2026-09-27. Read $1.45M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 25,650 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $943 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ATH or AMWBTC?
By tracked market cap: ATH (Polygon) measures — and AMWBTC (Polygon) measures $5.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ATH or AMWBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: ATH (Polygon) grades B and AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ATH and AMWBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show ATH at 0.00% and AMWBTC at +3.57%.
More comparisons
ATH vs ZENATH vs TSLAXATH vs TELATH vs TBTCFWOG vs AMWBTCPOOLS vs AMWBTCTOSHI vs AMWBTCCOOL vs AMWBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.