NexARGUS vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
ARGUS (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-30 / 2026-11-12.
ARGUS vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-30
| ARGUS | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000000000789 | $0.000000000000 |
| Market cap | — | $276.67K |
| 24h volume | $25.82M DEX | $0.00 DEX |
| Liquidity | $28.54 | $15.90 |
| FDV | $10.26M | $276.67K |
| Holders | 4,942 | 5,108 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 12 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ARGUS measures ~1.8× the liquidity of 牛来
- over the shared window ARGUS moved −100.0% while 牛来 moved −82.5%
What the data says
ARGUS
ARGUS on Base — 0x4a21564d908403009c2a1b2bd070ec4501612b07 — carries a name shared by several unrelated projects across chains, which is itself the first thing to verify: the address above is the only identity this page tracks, and ARGUS tokens at other contracts are different assets.
The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $28.5 of tracked liquidity with roughly $25.8 million of 24-hour volume — a turnover multiple near 5x, among the hottest in this index slice. Volume cycling at five times the pool daily is the signature of active two-way speculation; it says the market is trading it hard, and nothing about whether it should be.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x96594709ee85e343ad0be181b0f1a68a9b4ebb07 — is the third and smallest of the three same-named contracts: $15.9 of liquidity and roughly $16.3 million of daily volume in the October 10, 2026 snapshot.
Where the two larger clones price within a whisker of each other at ~$0.0001, this one trades at a fifth of that — same name, different unit scale, and 8x daily turnover. A smaller clone diverging in price from the mirrored pair reads as the runt of the deployment: whether it is an earlier deployment, a failed clone left running, or a deliberate third book, it is not interchangeable with its siblings and the address is the only identity that matters.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ARGUS or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: ARGUS (Base) measures — and 牛来 (Base) measures $276.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ARGUS or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: ARGUS (Base) grades B and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ARGUS and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-30, the measured snapshots show ARGUS at −100.0% and 牛来 at −82.5%.
More comparisons
ARGUS vs BNSOLARGUS vs JITOSOLARGUS vs JLUSDCARGUS vs JUPSOL牛来 vs BNSOL牛来 vs JITOSOL牛来 vs JLUSDC牛来 vs JUPSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.