NexAPRMON vs MUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
APRMON (Monad) vs MUSD (Linea) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-14.
APRMON vs MUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| APRMON | MUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01715 | $0.9828 |
| Market cap | $227.52K | $37.09M |
| 24h volume | $6.80K all venues | $16.91K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.69K | $378.79K |
| FDV | $227.53K | $5.48M |
| Holders | 4,958 | — |
| Age (days) | 311 | 169 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- MUSD measures ~163× the market cap of APRMON
- MUSD measures ~141× the liquidity of APRMON
- MUSD measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of APRMON
- over the shared window APRMON moved −39.5% while MUSD moved −1.13%
What the data says
APRMON
APRMON — aPriori's Monad liquid-staking token — is one of the first LSTs in this index on Monad: 0x0c65a0bc65a5d819235b71f554d210d3f80e0852, 293 days old on the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $227.5 thousand market cap across 4,958 wallets.
The structure flag is the one an LST can't avoid: the token sits behind a proxy, so the receipt logic is upgradeable — normal for staking infrastructure, real nonetheless. The float is fairly concentrated (top ten hold about 68.6%), and the venue is thin — $2.7 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, so exits are rationed by the pool, not the code.
MUSD
One detail on MUSD didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where MUSD stands today: workable liquidity of $417.40K and a maturing record at 169 days as of 2026-10-09. The $417.40K pool against a ~$37.78M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APRMON or MUSD?
By tracked market cap: APRMON (Monad) measures $227.52K and MUSD (Linea) measures $37.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APRMON or MUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: APRMON (Monad) grades B and MUSD (Linea) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APRMON and MUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show APRMON at −39.5% and MUSD at −1.13%.
More comparisons
RETH vs APRMONAPRMON vs NODAAPRMON vs BNSOLAPRMON vs JITOSOLMON vs MUSDMUSD vs CRVMUSD vs GOHOMEPYTH vs MUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.