NexAPM vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
APM (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-11.
APM vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| APM | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004199 | $0.01808 |
| Market cap | $3.54M | $17.29M |
| 24h volume | $1.01M all venues | $3.09M all venues |
| Liquidity | $816.04K | $791.97K |
| FDV | $39.30M | $17.29M |
| Holders | 7,718 | 92,257 |
| Age (days) | 23 | 224 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~4.9× the market cap of APM
- 龙虾 measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of APM
- 龙虾 measures ~12× the holder count of APM
- over the shared window APM moved −34.5% while 龙虾 moved −93.0%
What the data says
APM
APM at 0x72a22faa6a522c81a8f5d508381e18af3da0921e — deployed as "apM Fashion" — is five days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, the youngest book in this batch. The $3.5 million market cap sits against a $39.3 million fully-diluted figure on 10.0 billion units — less than a tenth of the supply is the priced float.
The launch book is real: $816 thousand of deep tracked depth on $2.0 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly twice the pool daily out of the gate. Everything else is unwritten: no holder distribution, no contract-level controls assessed — a five-day record carries only what the first days proved.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $17.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $792 thousand of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APM or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: APM (BNB Chain) measures $3.54M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $17.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APM or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: APM (BNB Chain) grades A and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APM and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show APM at −34.5% and 龙虾 at −93.0%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs APMAPM vs USD₮0APM vs TBTCAKE vs APM龙虾 vs USD₮0龙虾 vs TBTCUSDT0 vs 龙虾龙虾 vs USDC.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.