HostAPE vs TKALSHI — price, size and safety, side by side
APE (Ethereum) vs TKALSHI (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
APE vs TKALSHI — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| APE | TKALSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1584 | $447.17 |
| Market cap | $158.40M | $696.67K |
| 24h volume | $90.78K | $302.58K |
| Liquidity | $270.24K | $192.50K |
| FDV | $158.40M | $696.67K |
| Holders | 189,466 | 2,867 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- APE measures ~227× the market cap of TKALSHI
- TKALSHI measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of APE
- APE measures ~66× the holder count of TKALSHI
What the data says
APE
APE passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. It's a reassuring starting point: 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with the structural risks already off the table.
Looking at the market data, APE shows a $270.24K pool and a holder base of 189,466 as of 2026-09-27. Set the $270.24K pool against roughly $158.40M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 189,466-wallet holder base is a genuine strength on top of that: distribution that broad is hard to manufacture, and it means no single wallet quietly owns the float. Reassuringly, the wallet that created APE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
TKALSHI
TKALSHI — T-Kalshi on Solana, mint TKLSidmLVt3cqGaaodG8tyRzoANfQwoh67AccjmubeZ — is Tessera's tokenized exposure to Kalshi, the regulated prediction-market company. Tessera's site and handle are on the record; the $442.58 unit price across a 1,558-unit supply is share-scaling, not a memecoin. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $697 thousand across 2,867 holders.
Kalshi is privately held — like the OpenAI instrument from the same issuer, there is no public float to wrap. What a T-Kalshi unit legally represents lives in Tessera's structure: an SPV interest in secondary-market private shares if it's the real thing, a price-tracking synthetic if it isn't. The chain can verify the market — $192 thousand of liquidity, ~$239 thousand of daily volume — and cannot touch the claim.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APE or TKALSHI?
By tracked market cap: APE (Ethereum) measures $158.40M and TKALSHI (Solana) measures $696.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APE or TKALSHI?
On the contract checks we publish: APE (Ethereum) grades A and TKALSHI (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APE and TKALSHI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show APE at 0.00% and TKALSHI at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDUC vs APEMYX vs APEBERN vs APEAPE vs BTRME vs TKALSHITKALSHI vs RIFTTWO vs TKALSHITKALSHI vs SOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.