HostAMWBTC vs IDL — price, size and safety, side by side
AMWBTC (Polygon) vs IDL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
AMWBTC vs IDL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AMWBTC | IDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.05K | $0.3502 |
| Market cap | $5.14M | $5.77M |
| 24h volume | $13.74K | $18.62K |
| Liquidity | $943.43K | $812.80K |
| FDV | $5.03M | $6.81M |
| Holders | 9,807 | 19,837 |
| Age (days) | 1,518 | 312 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- IDL measures ~2.0× the holder count of AMWBTC
- over the shared window AMWBTC moved +3.57% while IDL moved −4.61%
What the data says
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $943 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
IDL
IDL — InfinityDAO — is a 312-day-old Polygon token at 0x4c18406fa690faa53e5efa899a971557251af72d, priced at a $5.8 million market cap on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The venue read is the strong side: $812.8 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is healthy against the cap — a book deep enough that normal hands can enter and leave without moving the mark hard. The unmeasured side is the caveat: contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, and holder distribution was not resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AMWBTC or IDL?
By tracked market cap: AMWBTC (Polygon) measures $5.14M and IDL (Polygon) measures $5.77M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AMWBTC or IDL?
On the contract checks we publish: AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B and IDL (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AMWBTC and IDL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AMWBTC at +3.57% and IDL at −4.61%.
More comparisons
FWOG vs AMWBTCPOOLS vs AMWBTCTOSHI vs AMWBTCCOOL vs AMWBTCCOAI vs IDLIDL vs ACTSWARMS vs IDLIDL vs GEOD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.