HostAMWBTC vs FELY — price, size and safety, side by side
AMWBTC (Polygon) vs FELY (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
AMWBTC vs FELY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| AMWBTC | FELY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $64.93K | $0.4504 |
| Market cap | — | $19.96M |
| 24h volume | $19.42K DEX | $1.20M all venues |
| Liquidity | $811.67K | $668.07K |
| FDV | $4.62M | $228.00M |
| Holders | 9,807 | 10,647 |
| Age (days) | 1,518 | 676 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- FELY measures ~62× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- over the shared window AMWBTC moved −19.9% while FELY moved +10.1%
What the data says
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $812 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FELY
FELY at 0xee997788f625809332baabb3110bcf1ba7400824 — Felysyum — is a Polygon asset 661 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $20.0 million market cap against a $228.0 million fully-diluted figure on 500.0 million units — one of the widest cap-to-FDV gaps in this index, meaning the overwhelming majority of supply has yet to emit.
The contract read is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — with the creator wallet holding a modest 0.78% of supply. Against that, the ten largest wallets hold 95.5%: a fixed contract over a deeply concentrated book. 10,647 holders share the remainder, and $668.1 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $75.9 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AMWBTC or FELY?
By tracked market cap: AMWBTC (Polygon) measures — and FELY (Polygon) measures $19.96M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AMWBTC or FELY?
On the contract checks we publish: AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B and FELY (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AMWBTC and FELY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show AMWBTC at −19.9% and FELY at +10.1%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs AMWBTCAMWBTC vs USD₮0AMWBTC vs TBTCAKE vs AMWBTCUSDC.E vs FELYFELY vs HLXTBTC vs FELYUSD₮0 vs FELY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.