HostAIPF vs FUN — price, size and safety, side by side
AIPF (Polygon) vs FUN (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
AIPF vs FUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| AIPF | FUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3115 | $3.42 |
| Market cap | $27.67M | — |
| 24h volume | $268.10K all venues | $19.94K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.13M | $1.97M |
| FDV | $27.67M | $172.10M |
| Holders | — | 31,265 |
| Age (days) | 324 | 121 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- AIPF measures ~1.6× the liquidity of FUN
- AIPF measures ~13× the 24h volume of FUN
- over the shared window AIPF moved −24.8% while FUN moved −57.3%
What the data says
AIPF
AIPF at 0x2c72d25530191ebd244eb6325e1892480b0e6e28 — styled AI Powered Finance — is a Polygon-native asset 306 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $27.7 million market cap across 75.9 million units.
The book is the strongest structural read in this batch: $3.1 million of tracked pool depth is deep relative to the cap — a pool that can absorb real exits — on $361.8 thousand of 24-hour volume, a tape that actually trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a question for the live scan rather than an assumption this page makes.
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $172.1 million market cap against $2.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AIPF or FUN?
By tracked market cap: AIPF (Polygon) measures $27.67M and FUN (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AIPF or FUN?
On the contract checks we publish: AIPF (Polygon) grades B and FUN (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AIPF and FUN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show AIPF at −24.8% and FUN at −57.3%.
More comparisons
ASTER vs AIPFXRP vs AIPFDRV vs AIPFPRIME vs AIPFSYRUPUSDC vs FUNFUN vs USDTCBETH vs FUNFUN vs USD0
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.