HostAIN vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
AIN (BNB Chain) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
AIN vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AIN | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02133 | $0.09075 |
| Market cap | $3.95M | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $67.27K | $7.04M |
| Liquidity | $336.63K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $21.27M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 18,094 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | 439 | 234 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~62× the market cap of AIN
- ZAMA measures ~105× the 24h volume of AIN
- AIN measures ~5.1× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
AIN
AIN — Infinity Ground AI on BNB Smart Chain, 0x9558a9254890b2a8b057a789f413631b9084f4a3 — is a fourteen-month-old AI-themed token holding $337 thousand of liquidity in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, against roughly $20.0 million of daily volume.
The pairing that matters: 439 days of age with turnover near 18x the pool. Age normally dampens churn — survivors settle into holder bases and quieter books — but AIN runs the opposite profile, the pool cycling its full depth many times daily. That reads as persistent market-maker or desk activity around an established token: the asset is old enough to have a trading history, and active enough that its price is being made, not found.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AIN or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: AIN (BNB Chain) measures $3.95M and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AIN or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: AIN (BNB Chain) grades B and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AIN and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AIN at −9.80% and ZAMA at −9.55%.
More comparisons
AIN vs FARTBOYPOP vs AINAIN vs CBLTCAIN vs LVMONGM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.