HostAAVE vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
AAVE (Ethereum) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
AAVE vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AAVE | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $155.43 | $14.30 |
| Market cap | $2.26B | $9.76B |
| 24h volume | $3.93M | $2.58M |
| Liquidity | $23.28M | $24.03M |
| FDV | $2.34B | $13.05B |
| Holders | 188,683 | 919,439 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~4.3× the market cap of AAVE
- AAVE measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of LINK
- LINK measures ~4.9× the holder count of AAVE
What the data says
AAVE
AAVE is the token of DeFi's biggest lending protocol — the asset that secures Aave's safety module and governs the money market that's been clearing loans continuously since ETHLend in 2017. The deployment 0x7fc66500c84a76ad7e9c93437bfc5ac33e2ddae9 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $23.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — thin against a float that trades everywhere.
The honest shape: AAVE's thesis is unusually concrete for a governance token — stakers backstop protocol shortfalls with their own stake, so the token is literally collateral for the system's solvency, which ties its value to Aave's actual revenue and risk book rather than pure governance vibes. That makes it closer to a productive asset than most of this index — with the caveat that "productive" here still means "exposed to one protocol's loan book."
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AAVE or LINK?
By tracked market cap: AAVE (Ethereum) measures $2.26B and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AAVE or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: AAVE (Ethereum) grades B and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AAVE and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AAVE at +17.9% and LINK at +14.4%.
More comparisons
USD1 vs AAVEETH vs AAVESUSDE vs AAVEFRXUSD vs AAVELINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKFRXUSD vs LINK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.