NexAAPLB vs SPYB — price, size and safety, side by side
AAPLB (BNB Chain) vs SPYB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-10.
AAPLB vs SPYB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| AAPLB | SPYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $350.60 | $754.80 |
| Market cap | $6.75M | $21.21M |
| 24h volume | $8.27M all venues | $7.92M all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.27M | $1.25M |
| FDV | $6.76M | $21.21M |
| Holders | 61,356 | 121,717 |
| Age (days) | 4 | 75 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- SPYB measures ~3.1× the market cap of AAPLB
- SPYB measures ~2.0× the holder count of AAPLB
- over the shared window AAPLB moved +4.60% while SPYB moved −1.11%
What the data says
AAPLB
AAPLB at 0x431a3bee82e2ca41e49895cbece5bb0f76a89b7a — deployed under the name "Apple" — is a four-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $6.7 million market cap, essentially equal to the $6.8 million fully-diluted figure on 18.9 thousand units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is thin but the tape is loud: $1.3 million of tracked depth against $879.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool dozens of times on day four. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
SPYB
SPYB at 0x7138b48df7d98d7e3cc221bfe7192d0a178182d8 — deployed as "SPY (bStocks Tokenized Stock)" — is a BNB Chain asset 75 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $21.2 million market cap across a 19.7 thousand supply.
The name claims a tokenized-stock structure; the measured data says nothing about backing, and this page does not assert it — what it verifies is the contract identity and the book: $1.3 million of deep tracked depth on $1.5 million of 24-hour volume, a genuinely active tape for a young deployment. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AAPLB or SPYB?
By tracked market cap: AAPLB (BNB Chain) measures $6.75M and SPYB (BNB Chain) measures $21.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AAPLB or SPYB?
On the contract checks we publish: AAPLB (BNB Chain) grades C and SPYB (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AAPLB and SPYB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show AAPLB at +4.60% and SPYB at −1.11%.
More comparisons
AAPLB vs QNTONDO vs AAPLBMORPHO vs AAPLBAAPLB vs LITSPYB vs QNTONDO vs SPYBMORPHO vs SPYBSPYB vs LIT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.