NexAAPLB vs CTM — price, size and safety, side by side
AAPLB (BNB Chain) vs CTM (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-12.
AAPLB vs CTM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| AAPLB | CTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $350.60 | $0.1785 |
| Market cap | $6.75M | — |
| 24h volume | $8.27M all venues | $607.04K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.27M | $1.31M |
| FDV | $6.76M | $58.16M |
| Holders | 61,356 | 4,989 |
| Age (days) | 4 | 189 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- AAPLB measures ~14× the 24h volume of CTM
- AAPLB measures ~12× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window AAPLB moved +4.60% while CTM moved −30.8%
What the data says
AAPLB
AAPLB at 0x431a3bee82e2ca41e49895cbece5bb0f76a89b7a — deployed under the name "Apple" — is a four-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $6.7 million market cap, essentially equal to the $6.8 million fully-diluted figure on 18.9 thousand units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is thin but the tape is loud: $1.3 million of tracked depth against $879.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool dozens of times on day four. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our November 6, 2026 read shows $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AAPLB or CTM?
By tracked market cap: AAPLB (BNB Chain) measures $6.75M and CTM (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AAPLB or CTM?
On the contract checks we publish: AAPLB (BNB Chain) grades C and CTM (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AAPLB and CTM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show AAPLB at +4.60% and CTM at −30.8%.
More comparisons
AAPLB vs QNTONDO vs AAPLBMORPHO vs AAPLBAAPLB vs LITCTM vs QNTONDO vs CTMMORPHO vs CTMMETH vs CTM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.