Nex牛来 vs ARGUS — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (Base) vs ARGUS (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-07 / 2026-09-30.
牛来 vs ARGUS — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-30
| 牛来 | ARGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001305 | $0.000000000789 |
| Market cap | $294.67K | — |
| 24h volume | $0.00 DEX | $25.82M DEX |
| Liquidity | $34.99 | $28.54 |
| FDV | $294.67K | $10.26M |
| Holders | 4,887 | 4,942 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 0 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- over the shared window 牛来 moved −93.4% while ARGUS moved −100.0%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x9daa8aa9a188032d6781715f77feb0adc4f96b07 — is the second of three same-named contracts in this index: $35.0 of liquidity against roughly $25.8 million of daily volume in the October 10, 2026 snapshot.
Look at the numbers next to its sibling: $9.725 million of liquidity versus $9.744 million — within two tenths of a percent — and a price within a thousandth of a cent of the other clone. Two contracts holding statistically identical liquidity at an identical price point is not a coincidence of markets; it is one operation running parallel books. Whether that arrangement is a coordinated multi-pool strategy or something less benign, the practical reading is the same: the two clones' fates are linked.
ARGUS
ARGUS on Base — 0x4a21564d908403009c2a1b2bd070ec4501612b07 — carries a name shared by several unrelated projects across chains, which is itself the first thing to verify: the address above is the only identity this page tracks, and ARGUS tokens at other contracts are different assets.
The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $28.5 of tracked liquidity with roughly $25.8 million of 24-hour volume — a turnover multiple near 5x, among the hottest in this index slice. Volume cycling at five times the pool daily is the signature of active two-way speculation; it says the market is trading it hard, and nothing about whether it should be.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or ARGUS?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (Base) measures $294.67K and ARGUS (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or ARGUS?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (Base) grades A and ARGUS (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and ARGUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-30, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at −93.4% and ARGUS at −100.0%.
More comparisons
牛来 vs BNSOL牛来 vs JITOSOL牛来 vs JLUSDC牛来 vs JUPSOLARGUS vs BNSOLARGUS vs JITOSOLARGUS vs JLUSDCARGUS vs JUPSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.