Host79AU vs U — price, size and safety, side by side
79AU (BNB Chain) vs U (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
79AU vs U — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 79AU | U | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.26 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | $1.31B | $1.41B |
| 24h volume | $1.68M | $4.40M |
| Liquidity | $17.60M | $14.16M |
| FDV | $1.31B | $1.01B |
| Holders | 41,285 | 75,050 |
| Age (days) | 114 | 17 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- U measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of 79AU
- U measures ~1.8× the holder count of 79AU
What the data says
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.3 billion cap on $17.6 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
U
U at 0xce24439f2d9c6a2289f741120fe202248b666666 is United Stables' dollar on BNB Chain — a fiat-backed stablecoin barely 17 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, and already carrying a $1.4 billion asset-wide market cap against a BNB Chain float priced $1.0 billion fully diluted. A billion dollars of supply does not appear quietly; that figure is the story.
Tracked depth reads $14.2 million — workable for the size — on $4.4 million of 24-hour volume, and the index flags what seventeen days always flags: the token is young enough that its track record is still being written. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 79AU or U?
By tracked market cap: 79AU (BNB Chain) measures $1.31B and U (BNB Chain) measures $1.41B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 79AU or U?
On the contract checks we publish: 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B and U (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 79AU and U performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 79AU at +4.38% and U at −0.12%.
More comparisons
79AU vs WAVAX79AU vs BETBOME vs 79AU79AU vs PEPEU vs USDCU vs AGXWEETH vs UUSDE vs U
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.