Open app

79AU vs TFUSD — price, size and safety, side by side

79AU (BNB Chain) vs TFUSD (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-10.

79AUB

$5.03
79AU on BNB Chain
Trade 79AU
vs

TFUSDB

$0.9997
Treuhand Finanzgruppe USD on BNB Chain
Trade TFUSD

79AU vs TFUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10

100 — shared start
79AU −2.16%  ·  TFUSD +0.01% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
79AUTFUSD
Price$5.03$0.9997
Market cap——
24h volume$1.39M DEX$3.59M DEX
Liquidity$5.03M$3.58M
FDV$1.18B$216.99M
Holders41,2853,953
Age (days)13233
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

79AU

79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $5.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the November 5, 2026 snapshot.

Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.

TFUSD

TFUSD — Treuhand Finanzgruppe USD — is a 33-day-old BNB Chain dollar token at 0x1794f2bb542c28c4cf14872c39c2e31f740dd102, priced at a fully diluted $217.0 million across 3,953 wallets on the November 5, 2026 snapshot.

The market side is the deepest in this batch: $3.6 million of tracked pool liquidity is real depth, and $2.1 million of daily volume keeps it honest. The contract read keeps one live lever — the token can still mint new supply, so circulation is a floor — while it cannot pause or blacklist, source is verified, and the top ten wallets hold about 34.1% of supply.

FAQ

Which is bigger, 79AU or TFUSD?

By tracked market cap: 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — and TFUSD (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, 79AU or TFUSD?

On the contract checks we publish: 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B and TFUSD (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have 79AU and TFUSD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show 79AU at −2.16% and TFUSD at +0.01%.

More comparisons

79AU vs JLP79AU vs LBTC79AU vs JUPSPX vs 79AUTFUSD vs PRIMEPST vs TFUSDTFUSD vs DRVTFUSD vs XRP

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.