Host67 vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
67 (Solana) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
67 vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 67 | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001674 | $0.09075 |
| Market cap | $1.73M | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $120.12K | $7.04M |
| Liquidity | $184.45K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $1.73M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 18,438 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | — | 234 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~142× the market cap of 67
- ZAMA measures ~1.7× the liquidity of 67
- ZAMA measures ~59× the 24h volume of 67
- 67 measures ~5.2× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
67
67 — "The Official 67 Coin" on Solana, mint 9AvytnUKsLxPxFHFqS6VLxaxt5p6BhYNr53SD2Chpump — is the token of the "6-7" meme, one of the purest attention assets in the index: a number that went viral as a gesture-and-chant meme, rendered as a coin. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $1.7 million across 18,438 holders.
The "Official" in the name does real work — dozens of 67-themed contracts launched during the meme's run, and this one won the liquidity contest to claim the canonical position: $184 thousand of liquidity, a live site at 67coin.com, and ~$57 thousand of daily volume, the most active book in this Solana batch relative to cap. Mint and freeze revoked.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 67 or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: 67 (Solana) measures $1.73M and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 67 or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: 67 (Solana) grades A and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 67 and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 67 at −7.75% and ZAMA at −9.55%.
More comparisons
67 vs CHATOSHI67 vs SLOTHDJI6930 vs 67TOAD vs 67GM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.