Nex果蝇 vs GALABET — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs GALABET (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-11.
果蝇 vs GALABET — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| 果蝇 | GALABET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00008899 | $0.0003274 |
| Market cap | $438.50K | — |
| 24h volume | $2.79K DEX | $20.82M DEX |
| Liquidity | $30.91K | $1.19K |
| FDV | $66.07K | $9.805644351263989e+44T |
| Holders | 7,706 | 52,665 |
| Age (days) | 6 | 293 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- 果蝇 measures ~26× the liquidity of GALABET
- GALABET measures ~7,468× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- GALABET measures ~6.8× the holder count of 果蝇
- over the shared window 果蝇 moved −87.6% while GALABET moved −100.0%
What the data says
果蝇
永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $30.9 thousand of workable tracked depth at the November 4, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.
The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.
GALABET
GALABET CASINO is a BNB Chain token tied to the betting site that shares its name, deployed at 0x6d6521283cd3fd0188fe0408e700a5790a0f6c61. This snapshot is dated November 4, 2026, 278 days after the contract first appeared.
The measured shape is unusual: $1 thousand of tracked liquidity and 52,665 holders, yet $2.3 billion traded in the last day — turnover roughly twenty-four times the pool itself, a signature of market-maker flow rather than organic buying. The top-ten wallets hold 100.0% of supply, so the entire float sits in a handful of accounts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or GALABET?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K and GALABET (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or GALABET?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and GALABET (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and GALABET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at −87.6% and GALABET at −100.0%.
More comparisons
果蝇 vs CAKEPOL vs 果蝇TSAT vs 果蝇果蝇 vs WEETHGALABET vs NODAGALABET vs BNSOLGALABET vs JITOSOLGALABET vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.