Host果蝇 vs EDEL — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs EDEL (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
果蝇 vs EDEL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 果蝇 | EDEL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0007154 | $0.03076 |
| Market cap | $438.50K | $19.85M |
| 24h volume | $986.53K | $559.68K |
| Liquidity | $83.02K | $699.99K |
| FDV | $715.42K | $29.29M |
| Holders | 7,706 | 31,928 |
| Age (days) | 6 | 313 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- EDEL measures ~45× the market cap of 果蝇
- EDEL measures ~8.4× the liquidity of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of EDEL
- EDEL measures ~4.1× the holder count of 果蝇
- over the shared window 果蝇 moved −35.6% while EDEL moved +5.01%
What the data says
果蝇
永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $83.0 thousand of workable tracked depth at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.
The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.
EDEL
EDEL at 0xfb31f85a8367210b2e4ed2360d2da9dc2d2ccc95 is a Base asset 313 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $19.8 million market cap with a $29.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable and the tape is alive: $700.0 thousand of tracked depth on $559.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling most of itself daily, real use rather than a dormant listing. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or EDEL?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K and EDEL (Base) measures $19.85M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or EDEL?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and EDEL (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and EDEL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at −35.6% and EDEL at +5.01%.
More comparisons
RDDT vs 果蝇UWU vs 果蝇GTA 6 COIN vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LMTLFI vs EDELEDEL vs MSFTXEDEL vs AGTEDEL vs BERT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.