Host果蝇 vs AAPLB — price, size and safety, side by side
果蝇 (BNB Chain) vs AAPLB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
果蝇 vs AAPLB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 果蝇 | AAPLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0007154 | $340.46 |
| Market cap | $438.50K | $6.40M |
| 24h volume | $986.53K | $879.66K |
| Liquidity | $83.02K | $25.61K |
| FDV | $715.42K | $6.31M |
| Holders | 7,706 | 61,356 |
| Age (days) | 6 | 4 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- AAPLB measures ~15× the market cap of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~3.2× the liquidity of AAPLB
- AAPLB measures ~8.0× the holder count of 果蝇
- over the shared window 果蝇 moved −35.6% while AAPLB moved +1.57%
What the data says
果蝇
永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $83.0 thousand of workable tracked depth at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.
The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.
AAPLB
AAPLB at 0x431a3bee82e2ca41e49895cbece5bb0f76a89b7a — deployed under the name "Apple" — is a four-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $6.4 million market cap, essentially equal to the $6.3 million fully-diluted figure on 18.9 thousand units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is thin but the tape is loud: $25.6 thousand of tracked depth against $879.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool dozens of times on day four. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 果蝇 or AAPLB?
By tracked market cap: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K and AAPLB (BNB Chain) measures $6.40M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 果蝇 or AAPLB?
On the contract checks we publish: 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B and AAPLB (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 果蝇 and AAPLB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 果蝇 at −35.6% and AAPLB at +1.57%.
More comparisons
RDDT vs 果蝇UWU vs 果蝇GTA 6 COIN vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LMTAPY vs AAPLBCHOCTOPUS vs AAPLBAAPLB vs TEMAAAPLB vs CRODIE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.